Wednesday, December 22, 2010

My Cubefield High Score



researchers have found a previously unknown relative of the Homo sapiens discovered. The new species is the whole of human history on its head

The finger bones of a child has brought the human family tree, a new member who may have lived 30,000 years ago next to the Homo sapiens. The surprising German researchers discovered that the bones discovered in a cave in Siberia is almost certainly to a new, previously unknown human species. solved in the scientific community very excited, for the first time, the analysis of prehistoric DNA rewritten the history of man. Life was 30,000 years ago much more diverse than we previously thought.

went Until recently, paleontologists believe that in front of 40,000 and 25,000 years in the direct vicinity of the modern man, Homo neanderthalensis lived only.
field researchers discovered in 2003 on the Indonesian island of Flores, then a smaller relative of Homo sapiens, who lived only 13,000 years should. The "Hobbits" of Flores were great in about a meter and go back to Homo erectus - a precursor of modern humans who left Africa 1.9 million years ago. The size of the hobbits was very probably a direct result of their isolation.

And now the latest discovery, with the number of known, has doubled in front of 30,000 living humanoids within ten years to four. But not only the occupation of human evolution is changed. Excavation of human fossils were scientists go so far by three major waves of migration from Africa. The first footprint, which indicates a departure from the black continent, wurde vom Homo erectus hinterlassen (jenem Vorfahren, den wir mit dem Neandertaler, den Hobbits und der neuen Gattung der menschlichen Familie gemeinsam haben).

Trennung vor dem Exodus?

Die nächste Wanderung ging vor etwa 450.000 Jahren vom Neandertaler aus. Schließlich verließen vor etwa 60.000 Jahren die ersten modernen Menschen Afrika, um Eurasien und das darüber hinaus gehende Gebiet zu bevölkern – die Wesen also, von denen alle gegenwärtig auf der Erde lebenden Menschen abstammen. Die nun in Sibirien entdeckte menschliche Spezies passt aber zu keiner dieser drei Auswanderungswellen. Sie deutet stattdessen auf einen weiteren großen Exodus hin, der vor ungefähr einer Million Jahre stattfand.

„Ich glaube, wir können uns jetzt in nichts mehr sicher sein“, sagt Professor Terry Brown, ein Experte für frühgeschichtliche DNA an der Universität von Manchester. Man weiß, dass die Geschichte in Afrika beginnt und frühe Formen des Menschen sich dann auf den Weg machten. „Es gab keinen Grund für einen Humanoiden, in Afrika zu bleiben, wenn seine Population immer größer wird“, sagt Brown. „,Es ist ganz natürlich, dass er dann weiterzieht“ Die Wanderung aus Afrika heraus dürfte sich aber eher nach und nach vollzogen haben. Die frühen Menschen wanderten immer nur, wenn und so weit sie mussten.

Man weiß außerdem, that (with the exception of the hobbits) all human species have evolved before their exodus from Africa. That different shaped humanoid is, ultimately, probably due to geography: species can be divided, when groups are isolated from each other. Pairs of these groups are not enough developed to address their genetic material and varies depending on the respective habitats. Finally, the differences are so great that groups can no longer reproduce with each other, even if they try.

on the vast area populated by groups of Africa probably a few thousand people each different areas. It should hier zu vielfältigen Trennungen gekommen sein. Einige Gruppen brachten den Neandertaler hervor, einige den modernen Menschen. Andere wiederum entwickelten sich zu jener bislang unbekannten Gattung, von der man jetzt einen kleinen Finger in einer sibirischen Höhle fand.

Nur eine Art hat überlebt

Das Faszinierendste an dieser Entdeckung ist tatsächlich der Ort. Der Knochen wurde in einem Gebiet gefunden, in dem auch schon Überreste von Menschen und Neandertalern aus etwa der gleichen Epoche entdeckt wurden. Die Funde sprechen dafür, dass zwischen 40.000 bis 30.000 Jahren vor unserer Zeit alle drei Gattungen zugleich dort lebten. Haben sie sich jemals getroffen? Kamen sie miteinander klar oder bekämpften they? And why only survived the Homo sapiens? Do we have to apologize not only for perhaps Neanderthals but even with this newly discovered species?

"It is quite possible that there was a time when the immigrated to a genus in the area and others emigrated. You have to see that ten thousand years is a long time and it's quite possible that they have never met, "Brown said. "But it can also be that they have regular parties held each other and talk about the Neanderthals, who lived just around the corner." If they have lived together, it does not necessarily mean that this was in permanent conflict. Related species of other animals - big cats, for example - share areas without their neighbors while otherwise contrary to accommodate as cool indifference. Conflicts are only likely when there is competition for food, partners, or shelters. Apart from that, well, all three types of people hunted large mammals, including woolly mammoth and rhino may have heard, whose remains were found in the area.

And what will be called the four of us now? There is no formal name it yet, the discoverer Svante Pääbo and Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, which had taken a finger bone DNA and analyzed gave our recent ancestors once nicknamed "X-Woman." Due to the size of the finger they suspect that he belonged to a child between five and seven years. Whether this was a boy or a girl, is so far unclear. The nickname is only one reference to the analytical procedure: They studied DNA, which was enclosed in small organelles called mitochondria. These are inherited through the mother.

The new method is more puzzle solving

The material analyzed so far indicates an early human being, with a million years ago had a common ancestor to modern humans and Neanderthals. The researchers hope to decipher in the coming months, the complete genome of the essence. This step will provide more than knowledge, whether it be a new species or not. For one of the questions that the research on the origin of human life on, and which can be answered very well by genetics is whether coexisting human species have been propagated to each other. Detailed investigations of several genomes of Neanderthals have not produced striking evidence that between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals came to reproduce.

There are good reasons to suspect that even if our family were never in close personal contact to us We have played a role in their extinction. Is it a coincidence that the extinction of Neanderthals in Europe shortly after the arrival of Homo sapiens? Some scientists argue that climate change is responsible. Others consider it more likely that Homo sapiens, the Neanderthals in the fight for food and other essential resources has put out.

dies also Homo sapiens at some point?

The discovery of new species contributes to the elucidation of this question but to nothing. We now know only that two human species have become extinct - if not in our immediate presence, then at least in our area. Why should it fare to Homo sapiens different from the others? Is it conceivable that we will die someday? Or are we simply destined for the role of another branch of the human family tree, which paved the way for the next, more advanced version of human beings?

As for the extinction, we should be safer because we can control our environment to some extent. Some biologists believe that we have stopped looking to further expand our evolution, or has at least slowed down considerably. "A global disaster would wipe out most of mankind and only a few hundred thousand would be left, it was strongly likely to develop away from us," Brown said. Even slammed ein Asteroid auf die Erde, der voneinander isolierte Grüppchen von Menschen zurückließe, würden einige aussterben und andere die Entwicklungslinie des Menschen unter anderem Namen weiterführen.

Die Geschichte unseres Lernprozesses über die menschliche Evolution zeigt allerdings, dass alles, was wir heute glauben, innerhalb weniger Jahrzehnte auf den Kopf gestellt werden kann. Einst hielt man die Neandertaler für unsere Vorfahren. Bis sich herausstellte, dass sie zur selben Zeit wie der Homo sapiens lebten. Jetzt wissen wir, dass dies auch für diese vierte Gattung gilt.

Die gute Nachricht besteht darin, dass wir nun die Möglichkeit neuer Erkenntnisse auf Grundlage von DNA-Analysen haben. Die Sammlung of fossil human remains is patchy and fragmented. Many very tiny fragments were characterized over the decades as relics of Homo Sapin, Hom neanderthalensis or Homo erectus and are now in museums and laboratories around the world. Are perhaps including pieces of bone from other, previously unknown human species? "It is quite possible that there are a number of human ancestors from whom we have no idea. I mean five, six or seven kinds of people, "Brown said. "Now everything is possible."

Source: http://www.freitag.de/wissen/1013-mensch-neue-art

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Wording Response Cards Vegetarian

Sex in the monkey cage

Warum Orang-Utans Sexfilme anschauen dürfen – und was sie dabei lernen. Frank Brandstätter, Direktor des Dortmunder Zoos, klärt auf

Bildquelle:  https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg_84ujZP9zVEEBViTm_mFoyL9goT_vn1nE2obXn1iyZ3kkmISY7oQ1CdbyVxSb6HtewPclEBzldi28YsHiukXlmPCs-Mql5HLhIhCVHppUEMUCY4mLP5SoBh_Aoa2DwWybdQ7YbF3yPNg/s1600/DonkeyKong.jpg

DIE ZEIT: Angeblich lassen sich lustlose Affenpaare durch das Anschauen von Pornofilmen zur Paarung anregen. Stimmt das?

Frank Brandstätter: Ja, das stimmt. Affen machen nach, was sie sehen, und lassen sich davon stimulieren. Wenn Menschen vor dem Käfig Grimassen schneiden, dann imitieren die Affen this, too. When sex works well.

TIME: Who is the first to come up with the idea to encourage monkeys with porn?

Brandstätter: I do not know. But this is a common understanding and is also available in the literature, in some animal horticultural work.

TIME: Have you tried the process in your zoo in Dortmund?

Brandstätter: Many years ago we had an orangutan lady who was afraid of monkey men. We have shown an erotic film in which people have very loved man and woman. That was not really pornographic, but both are very affectionate with each deal. As has Orang-wife started to pass even such tenderness. And then the men have let themselves range. Orang-utans, especially the males are generally very affectionate in attracting the female partner. She stroked her head, or nudging them gently. So I know from our own zoological experience that this works with the movies.

TIME: Are soft porn especially suitable for orang-utans?

Brandstätter: Not generally, it depends on what you want to achieve. I do not know how good you are, but in porn movies there are a huge range. You have to select the film properly.

TIME: The need to explain.

Brandstätter: Viele junge Orang-Utan-Männer wissen nicht, was sie mit ihrem Penis anfangen sollen. Sie haben keine Ahnung, wo der beim Weibchen hingehört. Sie probieren dann Verschiedenes aus, sitzen etwa auf dem Kopf des Weibchens oder sonst was. Wenn man denen nun zeigen will, wie es richtig funktioniert, muss man bedenken, dass bei den Orang-Utans aus anatomischen Gründen nichts geht, wenn sie Bauch an Bauch sitzen. Das heißt, man muss einen Porno aussuchen, in dem Geschlechtsverkehr von hinten gezeigt wird.

ZEIT: Warum nimmt man denn für diesen Aufklärungsunterricht nicht Affenpornos?

Brandstätter: Das wäre ideal. Aber es ist sehr schwer, solche Filme zu kriegen. however, it is porn with people everywhere.

TIME: Are apes general tuition needs when it comes to mating?

Brandstätter: Generally not, but in animals in captivity can occur occasionally. Even in the wild, the young know only how to do it if they have it off before I watch in the old. This is true for all animals. reared at the zoo but sometimes a pup by hand - and you have to show what it can not abgucken with other dogs. This is true not only for sexuality, but for example also for the foraging behavior. Even the great apes can communicate via corresponding television programs.

TIME: And the monkeys do not see any difference between man and ape?

Brandstätter: apes are clever enough to make us as people like to see them, just as we feel the other way around as they like us. Orang-utan men react strongly to human female with long red hair. Orange have even reddish hair and go there right into it. They are also much more capable of dealing with animal keepers who are a bit stocky and strong, so in stature a bit of what an orang-utan. From a dainty little person can say anything the monkeys. They react strongly to external stimuli, and appearance.

TIME: Is there such differences between orang-utans and gorillas?

Brandstätter: Yes, which are very different. Orang-utans are the people with the most similar in terms of behavior. This is perhaps because they are solitary, while chimpanzees and gorillas are among the herd animals. Before a single chimpanzee or gorilla you usually need not be afraid. But they are cowards, they feel strong only in the herd.

TIME: This group would then announced more porn?

Brandstätter: Who knows. That ought to try it.

TIME: Could porn stimulate other animals such as panda bears, yes chronic pairing problems?

Brandstätter: No, these animals do not react to the images. Only the great apes have the same perspective as people. The eye position is about the same and the quality of the eye as well. We once an old lady orangutan life beautified, which had to be alone in her cage. So they are not so bored, we have made her a TV in front of the plant. Den has loved her very much. Most of all she has watched MTV. The questions presented

Sabine Etzold

Source: http://www.zeit.de/2003/12/N-Affenpornos

Friday, December 10, 2010

Durabrand Portable Dvd Player Value

giant stork

He was almost twice as large as the diminutive islanders itself: 8000 years ago, a Storchart lived on the Indonesian island of Flores, which was up to 1.80 meters tall. Researchers have now found fragments of leg bones of animals. Whether the residents chased the birds, or whether it was the other way around is unclear.

A giant stork with more than 1.80 meters in size who once inhabited the Indonesian island of Flores. The storks were almost twice as large as the diminutive people who lived over 8,000 years ago on Flores. The question remains, who was hunting whom. The Dutch paleontologist Hanneke Meijer and her colleague Rokus Due to describe the National Archaeology Centre in Jakarta, the fossil discovery in the journal "Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society".

Die Fragmente von Beinknochen, die nach Angaben der Forscher zu einem Storch aus der Marabu-Familie gehören, sind 20.000 bis 50.000 Jahre alt. Die nur rund einen Meter großen Flores-Menschen, die von manchen Forschern als eigene Art namens Homo floresiensis eingestuft werden, starben vor etwa 8.000 Jahren aus. Die neue Storchart, Leptoptilos robustus, müsste rund 16 Kilogramm gewogen haben, schätzt Meijers. Die Vögel waren wahrscheinlich zu schwer zum Fliegen. Die Fossilien wurden in einer Höhle bei Liang Bua gefunden, in der auch Knochen der kleinwüchsigen Menschen entdeckt worden waren.

Die Insel, die nie mit dem Festland in Asien verbunden war, hat jede Menge ungewöhnliche Arten hervorgebracht: Mini-Elefanten, Riesenratten und die heute noch lebenden Komodowarane, die größten Echsen der Welt. Der "Inselfaktor" habe dazu geführt, dass sich die Arten entweder als Zwerge oder Giganten entwickelten, erklärte Meijer in einem Interview mit dem britischen Sender BBC. "Die Körpergröße des Leptoptilos robustus und das Leben am Erdboden sind die Folge der insularen Umgebung, in der es jede Menge Beutetiere gab und wenige fleischfressende Säugetiere", heißt es in dem Artikel.

Quelle:  http://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Insulaner-jagten-Riesenstorch-article2098691.html


Der Ibis (Vogel)-gestaltige Gott Thot:

See also:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherub

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Calories In Chinese Chow Mein

sheep with seven legs

From 02 August 2007.

on a farm in New Zealand lamb with seven legs came into the world - it has three rear-and four front legs.



malformations of this type are used for cattle only once in several million cases. According to veterinarian for an abnormality in the embryonic stadium in the womb is responsible.

"normal" brother

the way the animal even has a twin - a completely ordinary Lamm. Ein langes Leben wird dem außergewöhnlichen Geschöpf jedoch leider nicht vergönnt sein. Es ist nicht nur mit drei überzähligen Beinen, sondern auch als Hermaphrodit (Zwitter) und mit fehlgebildetem Verdauungstrakt auf die Welt gekommen. Teile des Darms fehlten, so dass das Schaf nicht in der Lage sei, Kot auszuscheiden, sagte Tierarzt Steve Williams. Daher müsse es getötet werden: "Es am Leben zu lassen wäre wohl wirklich unmenschlich."

Quelle:  http://www.vol.at/news/tp:vol:special_tiere_aktuell/artikel/schaf-mit-sieben-beinen-geboren/cn/news-20070802-02574900

Sleipnir



Sleipnir (such as "the gliding", alternatively spelled Sleipner) is in the Scandinavian mythology the eight-legged horse of Odin. It got its name because it is on land, water and air alike, "glides". Sleipnir Loki comes from a list. This had prevented the timely completion of Asgard, as a Rime Giants, who built the wall around Asgard, the completion of construction work, the goddess Freya would have to wife. Loki kidnapped in the form of a mare to the stallion of the giants, Svadilfari, who helped his owner at work, and had with him Sleipnir. Such was the colt disappeared for several days and the deadline to der Asgard fertig gebaut sein sollte, verstrich. Loki schenkte sein Kind, Sleipnir, später Odin.

Mircea Eliade schreibt, dass das achtbeinige Pferd das Schamanenpferd par excellence sei. Man findet es z. B. in Sibirien und bei den Muria, und zwar immer in Beziehung zum ekstatischen Erleben. Auf Sleipnir kann Odin durch alle Welten reiten. Von einigen Historikern wird vermutet, dass die acht Beine ein Symbol für die Beine von vier Menschen sind, die einen Sarg tragen. Somit ermöglicht das Ross auch, einen Reiter in die Unterwelt zu tragen. Auch Odin reitet auf Sleipnir nach Niflheim, um Balders Träume zu ergründen.

Sleipnir ist, laut einer Sage, auch der Grund, warum die Ásbyrgi-Schlucht auf Island die Form eines Hufeisens hat. Als Odin mit ihm über die Wüsten der Arktis ritt, soll das Pferd ausgerutscht sein und einen Fuß auf Nordisland gesetzt haben. Deshalb wird die Schlucht gelegentlich auch als Odins Fußabdruck bezeichnet.

Quelle:  http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleipnir